STUDY OF THE BIOCHEMICAL POTENTIAL OF MICROBIAL CONSORTIA

DTQXGM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2023.01.001

Keywords:

propionic bacteria, kefir starter culture, lactic acid microorganisms, consortium

Abstract

The analysis of scientific data on the use of probiotic cultures, the possibility of joint cultivation of Propionibacterium freudenreichii Sh-85 strain and kefir starter microorganisms is presented. The necessity of using propionic acid bacteria in order to increase the probiotic properties of fermented milk products is substantiated. The selection of Propionibacterium freudenreichii Sh-85 strain as a probiotic culture is based on such aspects as survival in an aggressive environment, adhesive properties, valuable production and technological properties. The main feature of propionic acid bacteria is the complex biosynthesis of metabiotics, namely vitamin B12, antimutagens, antioxidants. This enhances their valuable biochemical and probiotic properties. The most significant, from the point of view of manufacturability, the "milk" propionic bacterium is the Propionibacterium freudenreichii Sh‑85 strain, which can be used in work independently and in combination with lactic acid bacteria. It has been established that there are no antagonism and mutual competition phenomena between propionic acid bacteria and the microflora of kefir starter culture during joint cultivation. The article presents data on biotechnological and probiotic properties of consortia (combined starter cultures) with a different combination of propionic acid and lactic acid microorganisms. Kefir starter culture served as a control. In all test samples, the number of microbial cells of Propionibacterium freudenreichii Sh-85 and lactic acid bacteria reaches 109k.o.e./cm3, which clearly indicates a high density of the microbial population and a balanced growth of starter microorganisms in the consortium. The best balance of propionic acid bacteria and fungal starter culture 1:1 has been determined, taking into account biotechnological and biochemical properties, in particular, the synthesis of vitamin B12.  The resulting consortium can be recommended for further use in the biotechnology of fermented functional dairy products.

References

Шендеров Б.А., Синица А.В., Захарченко М.М. Метабиотики: вчера, сегодня, завтра. Санкт-Петербург : Крафт, 2017. 79 с.

Олескин А. В., Шендеров Б. А. Пробиотики, психобиотики и метабиотики: проблемы и перспек-тивы // Физическая и реабилитационная медицина, медицинская реабилитация. 2020. 2(3). с. 233-243.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab25811. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/probiotiki-psihobiotiki-i-metabiotiki-problemy-i-perspektivy (дата обращения: 07.12.2022).

O’Mahony S.M., Clarke G., Borre Y.E., et al. (2014). Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res, (277), Р. 32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027.

Butel M.-J. Probiotics, gut microbiota and health, Medecineet // Maladies Infectieuses. 2014. №1 (44), Р. 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2013.10.002.

Parvez S., Malik K.A., Kang S. Ah and Kim H.-Y. Probiotics and their fermented food products are bene-ficial for health // The Society for Applied Microbiology, Journal of Applied Microbiology. № 100(6). 2006. Р. 1171–1185. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x.

Тихомирова Н.А. Современное состояние и перспективы развития продуктов функционального назначения // Молочная промышленность. 2009. № 7. С. 5–8.

Решетник Е.И. Влияние компонентного со-става на пищевую и биологическую ценность ком-бинированного продукта / Е.И. Решетник, Е.А. Уточ-кина // Вестник ВСГУТУ. 2013. № 2(41). С. 63-67. – EDN PZDKZB.

Харитонов Д.В., Харитонова И.В., Просеков А.Ю. Разработка концепции создания синбиотиков и синбиотических молочных продуктов // Техника и технология пищевых производств. 2013. № 4. С. 91–94.

Патент № 2704857 Российская Федерация, Штамм лактобактерий Lactobacillusplantarum - ВКПМ – В-13052 продуцент молочной кислоты и антибиоти-ческих веществ и компонент закваски для производ-ства пробиотических продуктов / Цугкиев Б.Г., Рамо-нова Э.В., Соловьева Ю.В., Хозиев А.М., Кабисов Р.Г., Цугкиева И.Б., Петрукович А.Г., Ханикаев Д.Н., Абаева А.А.; Заявка 2018139600 от 08.11.2018. Опубл. 31.10.2019. Бюл. № 31.

Блинкова Л.П. Бактериоцины: критерии, классификация, свойства, методы выявления // Мик-робиология. 2003. № 3. С. 109–113.

Hong H.A., Due H.le, Cutting S.M. The use bac-terial spore formers as probiotics // FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005. Vol. 4. P. 813-835.DOI: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.001.

Stein T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and cell death // Mol. Microbiol. Ibid. 2005. Vol. 4. P. 845-857.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x.

Abdel-Mawgoud A.M., Aboulwafa M.M., Has-souna N.A. Optimization of surfactin production by Ba-cillus subtilis isolate BS5 // Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008. № 3. P. 305–325.

Jamil B., Hasan F., Hameed A. Isolation of Ba-cillus subtilis MH-4 from soil and its potential of poly-peptidic antibiotic production // Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007. Vol. 1. P. 26–31.

Muhammad S.A., Ahmad S., Hameed A. Antibi-otic production by thermophilic Bacillus specie SAT 4 // Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 339–345.

Boiarineva I.V., Zambalova N.A., Khamagaeva I.S. Technological aspects of innovative milk-based bioproducts. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Envi-ronmental Science // Earth Environ. Sci. 1052 (2022) 012069. on 24.08.2022 at 05:02. Р. 1–9.doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1052/1/012069.

Бояринева И.В. Теоретические и практиче-ские аспекты создания инновационных биопродук-тов для функционального питания с использовани-ем консорциума молочнокислых и пропионовокис-лых бактерий; автореф. дис. … д-ра техн. наук: 05.18.04. Улан-Удэ. 2020. 36 с.

Published

2023-04-18

How to Cite

Irina V. Б., Khamagaeva И. С. ., Stepochkina В. Д., & Bоbchenko В. И. . (2023). STUDY OF THE BIOCHEMICAL POTENTIAL OF MICROBIAL CONSORTIA: DTQXGM. Polzunovskiy VESTNIK, (1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2023.01.001

Issue

Section

SECTION 1. FOOD TECHNOLOGY