COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BEEF QUALITY DEPENDING ON THE AGING CONDITIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2022.01.010

Keywords:

beef, dry aging,, organoleptic properties, cutting force, chemical composition, functional properties.

Abstract

Recently, more and more attention of specialists has been attracted by studies of the quality of meat raw materials depending on the conditions of its maturation, including dry maturation, due to the increased demand for meat of this aging method, which has more pronounced organoleptic characteristics that allow it to be attributed to premium quality products. The purpose of the work was to evaluate the properties of high-quality dry-matured beef relative to similar raw materials of traditional maturation.

The studies were performed on bone cuts of the spinal-lumbar part of Hereford bulls. Maturation conditions: dry - aging in dry-aging cabinets, temperature 0... 1oC, relative humidity 75%, 42 days low positive temperature (0... 1oC), relative humidity 72-75%, duration 42 days; traditional - temperature 0 ...+4oC, relative humidity 85%, 5 days.

According to the organoleptic evaluation using a hedonic scale, tasters evaluate the taste, smell and consistency of dry-matured beef steaks as more desirable. The results of the organoleptic evaluation are consistent with the data of the consistency assessment by the instrumental method in terms of the cutting force, which was 16.5% lower for long-maturing meat. For dry-maturing beef, a higher water-binding capacity was established (by 4.9%), with a decrease in the mass fraction of total moisture in the meat and an increase in the mass fraction of fat and protein, which contributes to greater juiciness and tenderness of the meat. The data obtained suggest that prolonged dry aging leads to an increase in consumer quality and nutritional value of meat. In the process of high-temperature cooking, such meat loses less moisture (loss reduction by 4.7%). In general, the results of the work allow us to positively assess the prospects for dry maturation of high-quality beef, intended mainly for the catering industry.

References

Drey L., Travis O'Quinn Tenderness, Juici-ness and Flavor Contribute to the Overall Consumer Beef Eating Experience // Kansas Agricultural Exper-iment Station Research Reports. 2017. 3. Р. 27. DOI:10.4148/2378-5977.1361.

Sensory and Physiochemical Comparison of Traditional Bone-In Dry-Aged Beef Loin with Bone-Less Dry Ageing and Ageing Using a Moisture Per-meable Bag / Maurice G. O’Sullivan [et al.] // Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2018. 9. P. 1078–1098. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2018.99079 Sep. 19, 2018.

Beef Quality Preferences: Factors Driving Consumer Satisfaction / C. Felderhoff, C. Lyford, J. Malaga, R. [et al.] // Foods. 2020. V. 9 (3). Р. 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030289.

Беляев А.И., Горлов И.Ф. Ресурсосберегающие технологии производства говядины // Вестник Российской академии сельскохозяйственных наук. 2010. № 3. С. 10–14.

Лисицын А.Б., Козырев И.В., Миттель-штейн Т.М. Особенности производства и оценки высококачественной говядины // Все о мясе. 2015. № 3. С. 22–25.

Современные подходы к повышению эффективности использования генетического потенциала калмыцкого скота : монография / И.Ф. Горлов [и др.]. Волгоград: ООО «СФЕРА», 2019. 260 с.

ГОСТ ISO 11136-2017. Органолептический анализ Методология. Общее руководство по проведению гедонических испытаний потребителями в контролируемой зоне : введ. 2019-01-01. Москва, 2017. 43 с.

Антипова Л.В., Глотова И.А., Рогов И.А. Методы исследования мяса и мясных продуктов. Москва : Колос, 2001. 376 с.

Effects of post-mortem aging time and type of aging on palatability of low marbled beef loins / Lepper-Blilie A.N. [et al.] // Meat Sci. 2016. V. 112. Р. 63–68. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.111.

Effects of stepwise dry/wet-aging and freez-ing on meat quality of beef loins / Yuan H Brad Kim [et al.] / Meat Sci. 2017. V. 123. Р. 57–63. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.002.

Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles / Rhee M.S. [et al.] // J Anim Sci. 2004. 82. Р. 534‒550. DOI:10.2527/2004.822534x.

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Gurinovich Г. В., Khrenov В. А., & Patrakova И. С. . . (2022). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BEEF QUALITY DEPENDING ON THE AGING CONDITIONS. Polzunovskiy VESTNIK, (1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2022.01.010

Issue

Section

SECTION 1. FOOD TECHNOLOGY

Most read articles by the same author(s)