STUDY OF INFLUENCE OF TOP FERMENTING YEAST ON QUALITY INDICATORS OF WHEAT BEER

MFESBH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2025.02.011

Keywords:

wheat beer, beer wort, yeast, top fermentation, secondary fermentation, young beer, strain, fermentation byproducts

Abstract

The study is devoted to the features of using various strains of top-fermenting yeast in wheat beer technology, as well as assessing their impact on the quality indicators of finished beverages. The objects of the study were dry top-fermenting brewer's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains SafAle WB-06 and SafAle T-58. At the stage of malt mashing, the enzyme preparation Attenusim Core with basic glucoamylase activity (1600 AGU/g) was added at a dose of 0.7 g/kg of malt. Its use allowed to decrease the turbidity of the wort and increase the content of reducing sugars by 9.5% compared to the control (without using the enzyme preparation). It was found that throughout the entire period of main fermentation, the studied strains showed stable dynamics of beer wort fermentation. Fermentation was more intense in the wort using the SafAle WB-06 strain, as evidenced by the actual fermentation degree of young beer - 63.20 %. The analysis of the physicochemical parameters of the finished beer did not reveal any significant differences between the test samples, with the exception of the bitterness and turbidity parameters, which were slightly higher in the sample using the SafAle T-58 strain. Regardless of the yeast strain used, the finished beer samples met the requirements of GOST 31711-2012 Beer. General specifications. Chromatographic analysis of fermentation by-products in the finished beer showed a slightly higher total amount in the sample with SafAle WB-06 by 3.7 mg/dm3 compared to the sample with SafAle T-58, without exceeding the threshold limits for all the studied parameters. According to the tasting evaluation, the beer fermented with the SafAle WB-06 strain yeast had the best characteristics (23 points), it had a pleasant, rich taste with light ester and phenolic notes, a characteristic wheat aroma and moderate hop bitterness. The sample obtained using the SafAle T-58 strain and scored 20 points, had a bright hop bitterness, abundant, stable foam, but a less rich flavor and aroma profile.

References

Сандаков О.А. Разработка технологии пшеничного пива верхового брожения с дображиванием в бутылках: автореф. дис. ... канд. техн. наук: 05.18.07. СПб. : РГБ, 2006. 16 с.

Алябьев Б.А., Ростовская М.Ф. Особенности получения пшеничного пива // Хранение и переработка сельхозсырья. 2021. № 3. С. 81–94.

Иванова Е.Г. Оптимизация режимов приготовления пшеничного пива // Пиво и напитки. 2003. № 6. С. 16–17.

Меледина Т.В., Сандаков О.А. Пшеничное пиво верхового брожения. Особенности вкуса, особенности технологии // О напитках. 2002. № 6(24). С. 6–9.

McMurrough I., Madigan D., Donnelly D., Hurley J., Doyle A.-M., Hennigan G., McNukty N. Control of Ferulic Acid and 4-Vinyl Guaiacol in Brewing // Journal of the institute of brewing. 1996. Vol. 102. P. 327–332.

Серегин С.Н., Свиридова Г.Н. Пивоваренная промышленность России : успехи и нерешенные проблемы // Пиво и напитки. 2011. № 3. С. 10–11.

Кунце В. Технология солода и пива // Пер. с нем. 9-го изд. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. Профессия, 2009. 1064 с.

Саберзянова Г.В., Каменская Е.П. Влияние различных штаммов верховых дрожжей на процессы главного брожения при производстве пшеничного пива // Технологии и оборудование химической, биотехнологической и пищевой промышленности : материалы XVII Всероссийской научно-практической конференции студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых с международным участием. Бийск : Изд-во АлтГТУ, 2024. С. 400–404.

Vidgren V., Londesborough J. 125th Anniver-sary Review: Yeast Flocculation and Sedimentation in Brewing // Journal of the institute of brewing. 2011. Vol. 17(4). p. 475–487.

Scholtes C., Nizet S., Collin S. Occurrence of sotolon, abhexon and theaspirane-derived molecules in Gueuze beers. Chemical similarities with ‘yellow wines’ // Journal of the institute of brewing. 2012. Vol. 118(2). P. 223–229.

Каменская Е.П., Аверьянова Е.В. Количественный учёт микроорганизмов: методические рекомендации к лаборатор-ным работам. Бийск : Изд-во Алт. гос. техн. ун-та, 2007. 35 с.

Попова Н.В., Потороко И.Ю. Современные подходы к возможности интенсификации процесса затирания пивного сусла. Патентный анализ // Вест-ник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Пищевые и биотехнологии». 2018. Т. 6, № 3. С. 12–21.

Rodrigues F., Caldeira M., Câmara J.S. Devel-opment of a dynamic headspace solid-phase microex-traction procedure coupled to GC–qMSD for evaluation the chemical profile in alcoholic beverages // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2008. V. 609. № 1. P. 82–104.

Berry, D.R. & Watson, D.C. Production of or-ganoleptic compounds. In Yeast Biotechnology (eds D.R. Berry, I. Russell and G.G. Stewart), Allen and Unwin, London. 1987. p. 345–368.

Mandl B., Geiger E., Piendl Q., Brwi, 1974, 27, s. 57–66.

Betancur M.I., Motoki K., Spence C., Velasco C. Factors influencing the choice of beer: A review // Food Research International. 2020. V. 137. P. 109367.

Каменская Е.П., Дворяткина И.Б. Особенно-сти использования специальных солодов в технологии безалкогольного пива // Технология и товароведение инновационных пищевых продуктов. 2022. № 5 (76). С. 30–36.

Зипаев Д.В., Никитченко Н.В., Кашаев А.Г., Платонов И.А. [и др.]. Исследование показателей качества светлого пива, полученного с использова-нием солода из тритикале // Известия высших учеб-ных заведений. Пищевая технология. 2015. № 5–6. С. 77‒79.

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Kamenskaya Е. П. ., & Sabrezyanova Г. В. (2025). STUDY OF INFLUENCE OF TOP FERMENTING YEAST ON QUALITY INDICATORS OF WHEAT BEER: MFESBH. Polzunovskiy VESTNIK, (2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2025.02.011

Issue

Section

SECTION 1. FOOD TECHNOLOGY

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.